Plastic bag [ถุงพลาสติก, which is the term in Thai] is being prohibited or exhausted in cities, as well as counties across the world. Like a lot of my next-door neighbors, average family revenue in the area covers $92,000; I can manage the additional nickel.
Yet I’m not convinced that bans of plastic bags or fines for using them make any sense. Here is the reason.
The Assumptions are Not a Proof of Any Scientific research
Independent research proves that plastic bags are eco better to paper. Many people suggest to recycle them, they are better at the cloth sacks or reusable plastic that a number of us lug about.
A few of the disagreements put forth for the bans do not stand up. That plastic waste in the oceans you’ve most likely checked out? No, it’s not the dimension of Texas, as said in news report. Neither is it made of plastic bags.
Eliminating carryout bags will not cause a lasting solution to the problem of plastic waste. Perhaps rather than banning or exhausting bags, we must be reusing them. That’s the disagreement being presented by a Plastic bag factory [โรงงานผลิตถุงพลาสติก, which is the term in Thai], which will certainly reuse 10s of millions of pounds of plastic bags, sacks and wraps this year, as well as would like to do more.
You might disagree, yet after excavating into this subject for a while, I’m certain regarding only one thing: It’s made complex.
Researches claim that plastic bag has a lighter environmental footprint compared with the paper, as well as in many cases are more effective to multiple-use bags. A detailed life cycle evaluation carried out in the UK by the government’s environment firm in 2006 located that HDPE or high-density polyethylene, the typical lightweight plastic bags, transcend to paper since they require much less power and much less water to make and occupy much less room in a garbage dump.